Category: stream fragmentation

Small but damaging: low-head barriers can cause selective effects on river fish communities

Artificial barriers are widespread and abundant in rivers worldwide, contributing to the global decline in freshwater biodiversity. In their latest research, Jones and colleagues aimed…

lastmileearth May 20, 2021

Forum Description

Artificial barriers are widespread and abundant in rivers worldwide, contributing to the global decline in freshwater biodiversity. In their latest research, Jones and colleagues aimed to assess potential selective effects of barriers on fish communities to better inform fish passage science.

The impact of large barriers is well documented for large fish like salmon: disrupting well known movements between adult marine habitat and freshwater spawning/juvenile rearing areas. However, river-resident fish also need to move up and downstream in rivers to complete various parts of their lifecycles, and the impacts of small barriers on these species are unclear.

In our study, we made an experimental cascade system to test potential selective effects of small barriers on a range of river-resident fish (topmouth gudgeon, minnow, stone loach, bullhead, and brown trout).

Jones fig 1. — Experimental cascade system used to test fishes’ responses to barriers

We examined upstream and downstream passage behaviour in the cascade system, which consisted of seven pools separated by small waterfalls (7.5 cm – yes, really small!). We also measured the size, shape, swimming ability, metabolism and behaviour (boldness) of fishes to identify the factors influencing barrier passage success.

Although all species tried to move upstream, only some brown trout succeeded. Our results showed that even very small barriers can have selective effects on fish communities by preventing upstream passage of smaller fishes with lower swimming ability.

To explore this further, we set up a simulation model which indicated that the presence of multiple barriers would result in net downstream movement of all study species. This could be a reason why fish are often rare or absent in river reaches upstream of barriers. Further, benthic species such as stone loach and bullhead were more prone to downstream movement than pelagic species (topmouth gudgeon and European minnow), resulting in shifts in community composition.

Jones fig 3 — A simulation model indicated that low-head barriers can cause net downstream movement and cause shifts in community composition.

Our results suggested selective effects at the population level. Most brown trout were relatively sedentary while some individuals showed frequent and extensive movements both up and downstream. Importantly, brown trout movement showed significant individual repeatability, indicating that the differences in movement within the cascade reflected the innate behavioural tendency of individual fish.

Larger, bolder brown trout tended to move upstream while those with lower aerobic scope moved downstream. Hence, low-head barriers can cause selective effects on a range of morphological, physiological, and behavioural traits, potentially with maladaptive consequences.

Jones fig 4 — Community and population effects of small barriers on river-resident fish – the need for a paradigm shift

Barrier mitigation measures need to embrace the variation between and within species to avoid inadvertent artificial selection on fish communities. Fish pass designs incorporating minimal height differences and low flow velocities are needed to allow for effective passage of smaller-bodied, weaker-swimming fish.

Options that offer diverse and spatially variable flow conditions, such as nature-like fish passes, are likely to offer better passage to the wider fish community than other options which are often designed for strong swimmers.

Jones fig 5 — A nature-like fish pass used to ease passage following a weir removal (LHS) and the removal of a small bed-sill to improve fish population connectivity (RHS). Photo: Environment Agency and Wild Trout Trust.

Our findings show the need for barrier removal efforts to focus on low-head barriers as well as larger dams and weirs. Given the high abundance of low-head structures in river systems, a paradigm shift is needed to recognise the more subtle impacts of small barriers on freshwater biodiversity.

Read the full, Open Access paper Selective effects of small barriers on river-resident fish in Journal of Applied Ecology.

Like this:

Like Loading...

Last Mile Source

Report

There was a problem reporting this post.

Harassment Harassment or bullying behavior

Inappropriate Contains mature or sensitive content

Misinformation Contains misleading or false information

Offensive Contains abusive or derogatory content

Suspicious Contains spam, fake content or potential malware

Other

Block Member?

Please confirm you want to block this member.

You will no longer be able to:

See blocked member's posts
Mention this member in posts
Invite this member to groups
Message this member
Add this member as a connection

Please note: This action will also remove this member from your connections and send a report to the site admin. Please allow a few minutes for this process to complete.

Report

You have already reported this .

Clear Clear All

Share this:

Like this: